I'm hoping to catch it this weekend and will, of course, report back afterwards. Go see it guys! :)

So what are your thoughts on The Spiderwick Chronicles?
EDIT: My review is below.
I saw the film on Saturday. As a whole (and having not read the books), I found the film enjoyable. It's geared more for children, naturally, but it was easy enough to get into the story and characters and the "magical, unseen world" inhabited by goblins, faeries, ogres, etc.
That being said, I was surprised at how short the film ended up being (and feeling). The plot felt rushed, most particularly in the beginning and at the very end (the villians demise was particularly annoying and bogus to me), with the magical aspects of the story being thrust upon the viewer rather than eased into. But then, considering it's a film for families, anything longer might have been too much for youngsters. The writing team (which includes John Sayles!) appears to have done a clever job of condensing the books, but there are still loop holes--a major one having to do with David's character, Arthur Spiderwick.
At one point in the story, the Grace children must seek out Spiderwick to have him destroy the book and, when they discover him, he has lost all sense of time. As it turns out, he has spent the past 125 years hanging around in a secluded forest (doing what, we are left to guess) and walking around transfixed. He is not dead, but then, what has been doing and where exactly is he? It's bizarre and never explained. (Perhaps, I can only hope, there will be an important deleted scene on the DVD to explain this in the future!)
The cast is solid. Freddie Highmore's performance or, I should say, performances surprised me. He manages a terrific job at portraying twins with separate and unique personalities, a feat hard for even great adult actors to pull off. Sarah Bolger was fine. I loved her work in In America and, here, she pulls in a decent performance. The animated voice work (as well as the CGI effects in general) from Martin Short, Seth Rogen, and Nick Nolte are wonderfully done. The only actor who was problematic for me (and was a surprise) was Mary-Louise Parker. Parker is an oustanding actress, but in this fantastical flick she seems utterly lost..not quite in character and not quite with the story.
It's a first to see David in a fantasy genre, and it was exciting and strange and enjoyable watching him in this playful environment. Unfortunately, and as I suspected, his screen time is limited and his character is way underused (despite his relevance and importance to the story). But even with these disappointments, David manages to make Arthur Spiderwick a quirky, somewhat mad and somewhat playful character that--if left to another actor--would have gone completely unnoticed or remembered. That's one of the beauties of David's craft, and it was admitedly fun watching him partake in some of the animated sequences and even battle goblins. A later scene with veteran actress Joan Plowright is particularly memorable.
In retrospect, I only wish we could have received further glimpses of his character--a wish that I hope will come with the future DVD release.

3 comments:
Thanks for the review - Spiderwick hasn't come to DK yet - so I just have to wait patiently....
But it's nice to get a feeling of the movie and what to expect...especially concerning Davids performance - although he's always able to pull it off even the most vile and creepy characters...
- Rebecca
Andrea - I completely agree with you on there being too much condensation of the story. At the end the reunion of Spiderwick and his daughter should be moving but their relationship is never established beyond one quick scene.
When you consider that kids had no trouble sitting through the first two Harry Potter films that ran almost 2 3/4 hours each, why Nickelodeon felt the need to shortchange this story to "get right into the action" eludes me. It made the film seem rather generic.
And I can only imagine what DS could have done with his role with more screen time. It'll be interesting to see if the DVD has an extended version or some deleted scenes with him.
Henry, you make a really good point about the HP movies. The film did very much feel, as you put it, "generic". It's nice, it's enjoyable, but it could have been better.
I had a major problem the villian, too, which I forgot to mention in my review. He wasn't at all well-established and, because he was underdeveloped, he's not that terrifying and his demise was extremely annoying to me. LOL. Very anti-climatic.
*fingers crossed!* for extended/deleted scenes with DS.
Post a Comment